The penelopiad pdf download

Literature Poetry Lit Terms Shakescleare. Download this LitChart! Teachers and parents! Struggling with distance learning? Our Teacher Edition on Ransom can help. Themes All Themes. Symbols All Symbols. Theme Wheel. Everything you need for every book you read. The way the content is organized and presented is seamlessly smooth, innovative, and comprehensive.

Ransom Study Guide Next. A concise biography of David Malouf plus historical and literary context for Ransom. In-depth summary and analysis of every part of Ransom. Visual theme-tracking, too. After graduating, he divided his time between Australia and Europe, teaching English in a number of secondary and post-secondary institutions.

His first breakthrough as a writer came midway through his teaching career, with the publication of Four Poets —a volume of poetry. Although he largely shifted his focus to novel-writing in the mids, many critics as well as Malouf himself consider his early experiences as a poet key to his compact and lyrical style as a writer of prose.

In , Malouf published his second novel—the widely acclaimed An Imaginary Life —and subsequently resigned from his position at the University of Sydney to pursue writing full-time.

In all, Malouf has written nine novels, ten volumes of poetry, and multiple other works, including short story collections, essays, and even the librettos for several operas.

Historical Context of Ransom There is considerable debate over whether a real historical conflict resembling the Trojan War ever took place. Ruins of an ancient city founded in the 3rd millennium BCE and rebuilt several times do exist in modern-day Turkey, but it is difficult to know how much this historical Troy resembled its fictional counterpart; the Iliad was not set down in written form until the 8th century BCE, which was likely four or five centuries after the events it described.

That said, Malouf traces his own affinity for the story of Troy to his childhood memories of World War II, since he first heard about the Trojan War in s Brisbane—a staging ground for the war in the Pacific. The other two parts of English, Text Response and Comparative, focus on analysing texts like novels and films where students are then expected to produce an extended piece of writing reflecting on those texts' ideas, themes and messages.

Unlike Text Response and Comparative, in Language Analysis you will be asked to read 'cold material' meaning that you won't have seen the piece before, i. You are expected to read the article, analyse the persuasive techniques used by the author, and express this in an essay.

Let's get into it! What are teachers and examiners expecting to see in your essays? Note: Some schools may express the following points differently, however, they should all boil down to the same points - what is necessary in a Language Analysis essay. The first most important step is to understand the contention and arguments presented in the text because you'll base your entire analysis on your assumption.

This can be tricky if you're unfamiliar with the contentious topic, or if the writer expresses their ideas in complex ways. In the worst case scenario, you'll misinterpret what the author is arguing and this will subsequently mean that your analysis will be incorrect.

Never fear! There are many tactics to try and ascertain the 'right' contention - we'll go into detail later. This is where 'language techniques' come into play. You're expected identify the language used by the writer of the text and how that's intended to persuade the audience to share their point of view.

There are too many language techniques to count, but you're probably already familiar with inclusive language, rhetorical questions and statistics. For most students, this is the trickiest part of Language Analysis. When examiners read essays, they are expected to get through about essays in an hour!

This results in approximately 5 minutes to read, get their head around and grade your essay - not much time at all! The number of allocated marks are:. Exactly when Language Analysis is assessed within each unit is dependent on each school; some schools at the start of the Unit, others at the end. The time allocated to your SAC is also school-based. Often schools use one or more periods combined, depending on how long each of your periods last.

In your exam, you get a whopping total of 3 hours to write 3 essays Text Response, Comparative, and Language Analysis. The general guide is 60 minutes on Language Analysis, however, it is up to you exactly how much time you decide to dedicate to this section of the exam.

Your Language Analysis essay will be graded out of 10 by two different examiners. Your two unique marks from these examiners will be combined, with 20 as the highest possible mark.

This is just to get you thinking about the different study methods you can try before a SAC. You've got exams dating back to , so there are no shortages of practice papers! Make sure you brush up on the definitions of persuasive techniques. These mistakes do happen! Also ensure you're familiar with tones. Have a look at our tones for Language Analysis. Images including cartoons, illustrations, and graphs are something you also need to get your head around.

Understanding how an image persuades its audience can be challenging, so test yourself and see if you know to look for these 10 things in cartoons.

Doing this study all by yourself can be rather daunting, so we've got your back. We specialise in supporting VCE English by creating helpful videos, study guides and ebooks.

Here are some just to get your started:. Check out our entire YouTube channel and don't forget to subscribe for regular new videos!

Here's a compilation of all the ones we've covered so far:. Many people overcomplicate Language Analysis, and as a result, they think it's much harder than it should be. I was one of those people. However, I wanted to achieve more.

I tried using more advanced language techniques, tried to make my analyses more complex, but they all failed. Find out more by accessing a sample of my ebook via the Shop page , or at the bottom of this blog.

Analysing can get messy when you will have dozens of annotations sprawled across the text. Start testing out strategies that work for you. For example, try using idea-based-colouring. This means that if the article discusses injustice — for all techniques you identify dealing with injustice, highlight it yellow.

For freedom, highlight them green. This will have you annotating and grouping ideas in one go, saving time and confusion. Another approach is to use technique-based-colouring, where you highlight same or similar techniques in the one colour.

If you haven't watched this video series, don't worry if it doesn't make sense to you for now. The point here is how the colours help me to quickly locate ideas when I'm writing my essay. Once you've done some analysis and revision , it's time to write plans! Plans will help ensure you stick to your essay topic, and have a clear outline of what your essay will cover.

This clarity is crucial to success in a Language Analysis essay. Doing plans is also an extremely time-efficient way to approach SACs. Rather than slaving away hours upon hours over writing essays, writing plans can will save you the burnout, and get you feeling confident faster. Writers only get better by actually writing. Even if you just tackle a couple of essays then at least you will have started to develop a thinking process that will help you to set out arguments logically, utilise important quotes and time yourself against the clock.

It will help you write faster as well — something that is a major problem for many students. With that said, let's get into how to write a Language Analysis next. Since we've established that Language Analysis is quite different from Text Response and Comparative, it's not surprising that the essay has its own set of best practices and rules.

Depending on how many texts you're given in your SAC or exam it can be up to 3 texts , you should have an idea of how you plan to execute your essay accordingly - whether that be through a block structure, bridge structure or integrated structure. Try to keep your introduction to the point. There's no need to prolong an introduction just to make a set number of sentences.

It's always better to be concise and succinct, and move into your main body paragraphs where the juicy contents of your essay resides. In Language Analysis, it seems that schools teach their students different acronyms, whether it be TEE :. And if your teacher or school teaches you something slightly different to the aforementioned acronyms - that's okay too. At the end of the day, the foundations in what's expected are the same. Below is an integrated structure example:. As you're writing essays, you'll probably find that you're using the word 'persuades' very often.

The life of an English teacher during assessment time is miserable. This is great for us! If you know how to use their misery to your advantage. Hello, I am here to teach you how you can claim some easy English points off these poor, poor, professors. This should be a baseline expectation! Historical context generally entails listing the form novella, play, etc… of your text; the time period in which it was written Victorian, 20th century, etc… , its genre Gothic, biographical, etc… , and finally, any of the relevant literary titles it could be classed under Romantic, Feminist, post-colonial, etc….

You must impress an assessor within two minutes. With this in mind, what do you think looks better: a little five-line intro vaguely outlining your points and just barely tickling on the structure and context of the texts; or a sprawling introduction which hits the historical context on the head and articulates beautifully the direction your essay is going and how it plans to get there.

Your topic sentences NEED to be easy to read and easy to follow. Apply the K. S rule here Keep it Simple, Stupid. State the point of your paragraph with clarity, there should be nothing too complex or vague about it. If you feel you cannot encapsulate your topic within a single sentence, then I suggest dialling back the complexity of your paragraph topic. Remember, text response is a process of stating a concept, then proving it — nothing more, nothing less.

Make sure your expression is on point. Avoid run on sentences, break them up with full stops, a comma is not a substitute for a period. This kind of rather basic English knowledge can seriously pepper up your analysis once you understand how language works. Begin by simply noting how an adjective modifies a verb within a sentence and what affect that has. Once you master this, you can move onto actually classifying the language under specific tones; for example: a pejorative verb, or a superlative adjective of degree.

Structure is the Bifrost which separates the land of Gods from the land of mortals. Some good ways to begin thinking about structure include: pondering how the text begins and ends, does it begin as a jovial and upbeat story and end as a depressing mess, why might the author have structured the text this way?

Or, think about which characters we follow throughout the text and what journey they undergo, are their multiple narrators? Why might this be relevant or what may the author be trying to emphasise? Another great one is just looking for recurring themes and motifs across the text, such as a repeated phrase or similarities between characters.

The key to writing on structure is understanding how the text has been structured, and then connecting that to a meaning or using it to support your contention. I cannot stress this enough, use TEEL topic sentence, evidence, elaboration, link , use whatever your teacher taught, but use it! Once you understand how to structure an essay, everything else improves. So, structure your essays!! An allusion is any reference within a text to another text. Or when your protagonist happens across a bible verse, that is a biblical allusion.

Whenever I hear a student mention a literary allusion, my day improves and so does their mark. Most every text has allusions in it somewhere, do your research. This one is eating from the tree of knowledge. Including a philosophical concept in your essay immediately places you in the upper echelons. It separates plebs from patricians.

Bonus points for philosophical ideas that were relevant to the time period historical context, remember. Referencing the authorial agenda is just minty fresh, it demonstrates a clear understanding of concepts even beyond just the text itself. If you made it to the end of this then great work! Including these tips in your essays is a surefire way to push them to the next level.

Thanks again for getting this far, unless you just scrolled to the bottom hoping for a TLDR. The film approaches concepts such as trade unionism, corruption, and racketeering, and is a story that stitches together other stories. As discussed later , Kazan used Terry Malloy as a representation for his own real-life struggles against the powers above.

The film is also a depiction of the hardships of life on the docks in s America. Inspired by real-life incidents, Kazan has created a world where workers live under the iron fist of corrupt trade union bosses.

Firstly, threats are repeatedly made against all the longshoremen in an effort to ensure that if anyone dares to act out against Friendly, they are sure to meet dire consequences. Their fear is reinforced through the various murders committed by the gang, most of which are the deaths another longshoremen, thus warning the workers that any one of them may be next.

Although Friendly is clearly behind the homicides, the longshoremen and their families are unwilling to speak to the authorities, as they know full well that they would be risking their lives. This demonstrates their lack of protection and vulnerability in the hands of the union leader, which is exactly what he has aimed to establish.

Faith is a strong underlying theme set forth by Father Barry and the church. To do what is morally correct is a simple concept but one that is difficult for the longshoremen to embrace. It is only when they begin to have faith in their actions that things begin to change on the waterfront. The film poses the question, what is true loyalty?

Friendly pretends to be looking after the longshoremen by sending out loans and offering them better work positions, for example, Terry on the loft. However, in reality Friendly uses this action to manipulate the men to his advantage. It is a tactic to ensure that the longshoremen believe that they in return, have to support Friendly. He ultimately learns that instead of abiding by Friendly, he needs to be loyal to himself, and this eventually saves himself and the other longshoremen from the clutches of the union leader.

His behaviour shifts from an introverted person who appears uncomfortable in his own skin as he refuses to look people eye-to-eye and constantly chews gum, to someone who possesses a confident stance, standing tall and proud. On the Waterfront emphasises that it is never too late to redeem oneself. The religious imagery of Joey, Dugan and Charley ascending to heaven demonstrate that although they had spent much of their life turning a blind eye to the indiscretions of Friendly and his men, their actions at the very end of their lifespan allowed them to compensate for their sins.

Bird symbolism is heavily embedded throughout On the Waterfront. When the longshoremen await work on the docks, the recurrent high-angle shots peer down at them, depicting them as a flock of birds, rummaging around. Canaries were once used as a barometer for air quality down in mines. Thus, this would be an indication for miners of whether or not it was safe to work in the pit.

The river is always subtly lurking in the background of several scenes throughout the film. The ever-present fog is a veil that manages to conceal Manhattan on the other side of the river. At the end of the film however, when Friendly no longer exerts any control over the men, the shot of the Hudson River and the city on the other side is crystal clear. The outlines of the skyscrapers, which were once unidentifiable, are now easy to recognise, demonstrating that the men are free, as their vision is no longer clouded by Friendly.

Gloves have significant meaning in two key scenes in On the Waterfront. Charley begins to feel uncomfortable in his clothing and removes a glove when he confronts the truth about being solely responsible for coercing Terry into forfeiting his career and subsequently becoming just another longshoremen.

On the surface, the windbreaker is simply a jacket that is passed amongst the longshoremen, in particular, from Joey to Dugan to Terry. The sharing of the jacket represents camaraderie and brotherhood, since the men have little money to spend on buying warm clothes and as a result, most of their clothing has been worn through.

This is a stark comparison with the mob, who are proud owners of long thick coats with scarves, hats and gloves to protect them from the Hoboken bitter cold weather. Symbolically, the jacket motivates the three men stand up to Friendly. Firstly, Joey talks to the Crime Commission yet before he is able to do any damage to the mob, he is found dead.

Unfortunately, Friendly manages to successfully silence Dugan. The windbreaker is ultimately passed to Terry who testifies in court and defeats Friendly once and for all.

The jacket demonstrates that even with murder, the truth cannot be silenced. On the Waterfront portrays a world where people are only successful through money and violence. We are able to understand the moral struggles of the characters through the cinematic devices used in On the Waterfront. For more sample essay topics, head over to our On the Waterfront Study Guide to practice writing essays using the analysis you've learnt in this blog!

This essay prompt is an example of a theme-based prompt. P3: Terry sits in between these two notions for most of the film. This is a 7 part series of videos teaching you how to analyse articles for your SAC. Your school will give you three texts which can consist of articles opinion, editorial, letter to the editor or images cartoons, illustrations, graphs. Make sure you download and analyse VCAA exam yourself first, then join me in analysing the texts together. Scroll all the way to the bottom of this blog post to download my annotations plus the full essay referenced in these videos.

Let's get started! It can be difficult to understand what is expected of you, as this SAC definitely varies from your typical English essay! Whilst your other English SACs may require you to write in a formal and sophisticated manner, the oral presentation SAC is the one shining exception! Many students fall into the trap of writing a frankly boring and uninspiring speech that does no justice to their academic ability.

Here are some mistakes to watch out for:. Your school may or may not already give you a list of topics to choose from. However, in the event that you must research your own topic, it is essential that you choose an issue relevant to your current audience. You must adopt a clear contention in your speech. Do not, for example, write a five-minute speech on why one sports team is better than the other, or why murder should be illegal. Choose an issue that you can take a passionate stance on and engage the audience with.

Avoid a contention that is obvious and aim to actually persuade your class. This is one of the biggest mistakes students make when writing their oral presentation. I cannot stress this enough — your speech is not a formally written text response! You are presenting your stance on an issue, which means that you are allowed to be passionate and creative.

You can educate your audience on the facts without boring them to sleep. Samples 1 and 2 have the same information. Yet, Sample 2 engages with the audience in a much more effective manner.

Try to avoid an overly formal tone and speak with passion and interest. Presenting in front of your class can be a very daunting experience. However, in order to distinguish yourself from your classmates, you must speak clearly and with confidence.

Try to avoid making the following mistakes:. Think back to primary school. Remember when your teacher would read you a storybook, and they would put on voices to make the story more engaging and interesting?

The same sort of idea applies to your oral presentation. Simply reading a well-written speech will not get you marks. Rather, you should talk to your audience. Make eye contact, maintain good posture, and project your voice. Confidence is key! The oral presentation SAC is not an assessment that you can simply wing on the day.

Oftentimes, poor scores stem from a lack of preparation which can be reflected in the way students present themselves — and stalling for time is a big giveaway. This can be especially difficult if you are presenting the same topic as one of your peers. This is another big mistake students make when presenting. Now, imagine if every person who presented before you began their speech with:. It gets repetitive. You can distinguish yourself by beginning in a myriad of other ways.

How to Write a Killer Oral Presentation outlines other ways to start your speech with examples! Your teacher will be able to tell if you choose a topic that you have no interest in, or if you are simply regurgitating information. Use this SAC to learn about an issue and take interest in your learning. Believe me, your grades will thank you for it.

Whether you are allowed to present with visuals or not is up to your English teacher. However, it is essential that you do not incorrectly use these visuals, as it can cost you marks. However, PowerPoint can quickly steer you away from presenting your topic in an engaging manner.

This is an oral presentation with a stance on an issue, not an assessment where you are marked for presenting information to an audience. Therefore, reading off of PowerPoint slides is a big NO. The point of focus of your oral presentation should be on YOU — your words, your stance on the issue. This ties into the PowerPoint criticism I made above, but using a cluttered infographic takes away from your well-written speech.

Below is an example of an overly cluttered infographic:. If your speech was on renewable energy, your audience would be detracted from your stance, and too focussed on reading the information from the visual. If you have any key information that needs to be explained, it is better to embed this into your speech than rely on an infographic.

Do not waste all your hard efforts by not taking the SOI seriously. I like to think of an SOI as a language analysis of your own speech. Essentially, you should be explaining your choice of language, tone, and rhetoric, and justifying why that would make a profound impact on the audience. Make sure you understand what an SOI is.

I hope that going through these mistakes will help you when writing your own oral presentation! Happy writing! Power-up your learning with free essay topics, downloadable word banks, and updates on the latest VCE strategies. Unfortunately, we won't be able to answer any emails here requesting personal help with your study or homework here!

All Rights Reserved.